All the wrong people
A couple of weeks ago, an old friend in Brussels I know from EU politics messaged me on Signal asking me how I was. “I can’t reply fully now” I told him, “I am in rural Romania on #CrossBorderRail.”
“Oh are you doing another tour?” he replied.
Well, yes, just 7 weeks and a massive crowd funding effort, my most complicated tour yet. And he had not seen it anywhere on any platform we are both still using.
And then this morning on LinkedIn, there is someone I have never heard of and do not know personally commenting on something I wrote, and worse still alleging I am drawing a conclusion that I did not even make. On LinkedIn it is ever thus, mansplaining on demand.
But the crux essentially is this: my digital communication is landing too often in front of the eyeballs of the wrong people.
I’d rather like it that my old friend in Brussels would roughly know what I am doing, and I would also rather like it that some know-it-all did not think it was fair game to dump his wisdom into my feed.
I can of course explain how a lot of this came to pass.
Facebook – when it used to work – was the network for that wider network of friends sort of thing, the place for births, deaths, marriages, significant life events. But then it enshittified, and once Zuckerberg cosied up to Trump I abandoned it – but even were I still there it is broken.
Twitter – when it used to work – was the public forum for the discussion about politics and transport, and since Musk killed that one, those sorts of public discussions have splintered.
I loathe LinkedIn and its I’m-cleverer-than-you passive aggressive positioning tone, but given half the railway industry is there cannot afford to ignore it completely, but what I am posting there is getting little in the way of response and most definitely is not generating a meaningful discussion or anything in terms of learning for anyone. And while Mastodon is great fun, and Ivory on Mac and iOS make the usability excellent, the community there is heavily German and remains small. Most of the former Brexit analysis crew have de-camped to Bluesky but the rest of the EU politics bubble has not, and I find the app experience – especially on a computer poor – and find myself only using it intermittently.
I have a rudimentary newsletter system on this blog and my rail commentary site – you can get notifications of new posts by signing up in the sidebar. But I am not into newsletters really – either as a consumer of them, nor as a producer of one on a regular schedule. And Substack is evil, so I am sure as hell not going there. And trying to make a weekly podcast or weekly video is beyond my technical ability and financial means.
But what do IΒ do about this? How do I put this right? Can I put this right?
If you are reading this, do comment below and tell me how you found the post, and tell me what I ought to do differently, and what might work for you. The only constraints: no Meta tools (Insta, Facebook, WhatsApp), no X, no Substack. But beyond that I will consider all suggestions!
linkedin is how I found this post (first found you on londonreconnections about a year ago).
linkedin needs a specific writing style to get traction and a thick skin for the kind of response that will come (responses which may be formed in a hasty manner or ignorant of prior art; and needs a specific mode of reply to keep an audience).
hard to get the right audience via a standalone blog site.
Hey Jon! I found your stuff.. I think.. by people using the #CrossBorderRail hashtag on Mastodon. But i work in the tech industry, not the railway industry.
If tired of preaching to the convinced, go TikTok. Yes, TikTok is evil, too. But once you trespassed the shame barrier, it’s great for reaching random audiences. No equipment needed, your iPhone and CapCut will do. Make sure the first seconds feature something capturing attention, but then do not bother explaining something interesting far beyond common length recommendations.
No. Ethics say no. Sorry.
Hi Jon thanks for sharing the frustration which I sort of share. One sideish thought. LLMs seem to have lowered the bar for anyone to write convincing sounding English on LinkedIN rather quickly. Which is nice and everything. But it may mean there’s way more stuff to cut through on LinkedIN that wasn’t there previously and less chance that our target audience sees what we’d like them to see.
I follow you on Mastodon and LinkedIn.
Ghost is a good solution, with a builtin activitypub integration π
Why not to make a real podcast (I mean having an audio one, you can keep the video) and host it on a podcast platform ? I personnaly use castopod (open source and part of the fediverse) for my own podcast.
This way, it’s available on all streaming platforms, and your audience can listen to you in audio format or video format.
I am not a big consumer of podcasts, so I am probably not the right person to make my own podcast!
I feel your pain Jon. For work stuff I currently focus on LinkedIn for discoverability while building a newsletter list and blog so I can ‘own’ my content and help people cut through the algorithms. I also do a podcast. To be seen, you have to go where the audience are. So LinkedIn is my compromise in that sense as I have left X. So where else is your audience?
The great advantage you have is the ability to create analysis content as well as visual/storytelling about your travels. I think you should consider softening some of your ‘red lines’ here. Can you collaborate, experiment or learn to do Steve Marsh/Geoff Marshall- style vlogs? Likewise podcasts. Or maybe a regular column for a website, newspaper or magazine. The other option might be more in person events.
I found myself here purely by chance.Well, not really.Some background is necessary.
I am currently in N.W. Kenya,East Africa,a plcae called Turakana county.where nothing really major goes on apart from regular famines & droughts,which seem to happen every ten (10 years)since 1960,the last one being in 2022.
The other major thing is, some approx. 300,000 refugees are hosted in N.W Kenya,Kakuma under UNHCR ‘protection’ and ‘feeding’ by WFP.
To cut the whole story short,i came here via linkedin because,an expert of UN reforms,by own standards, called Ron,whom i follow on linkedin,somehow liked your linkedin post.The rest is history.
Now,on the concerns you raised,you are absolutely right.It is a pity i don’t have any advise for you, now,indeed the title of your article ‘All the wrong people’ is a good explanation.The digital world and social media operates in away,that ‘forces’ all manner of content to the eyeballs of everyone in their platform.Pick and choose.
Ron is an old friend, and a brilliant mind – and although we work in different fields I often read what he writes!
This article reached me via Emailnewsletter.
But I am following you on Mastodon as well.
For my part, if I share anything you wrote, it is in general because I deem it interesting or because I want to give you more reach. I don’t like Mastodon that much, so I follow you on BlueSky and LinkedIn.
I saw your post on LinkedIn thanks to a repost from Philip Weiss. I agree, algorithms are crap, so itβs worth trying to build your email list and send a regular newsletter (monthly will do!). On LinkedIn I’ve been proactively connecting with my target audience and commenting on their posts, which helps for visibility.
Best of luck and talk soon!
Cheers,
Nicholas
I have your blog in Feedly, my RSS reader.
I found my way to this post via LinkedIn. But the algorhtym there serves me mostly work related things and your posts I see very seldomly. I also don’t scroll LinkedIn on daily basis, which probably further worsenes which content is served to me. I’m sad that I didn’t see your posts about planning the 2025 #CrossBorderRail and your crowdfunding campaign.
One potential solution could be to create a closed LinkedIn group. It gives you direct communication channel to those who are interested and to those who you want to have access to information.
I found this on Bluesky!
I found this on Bluesky, where I’ve found a decent contingent of people posting about policy and politics. I get better engagement there than on any other platform.
Although I’m on LinkedIn I’m there for the tutorials, not the social feeds. I left Twitter a couple of years ago, and Facebook gets worse every time I visit, infested with generative AI slop and ragebait.
The Mastodon experience really depends on your starting instance. I find it quiet, but excellent for tech content, so I do pop back in from time to time. I don’t get the German bias at all – and that’s a language I have enabled – so you might get better results by experimenting with different instances.
Oh I am fine with the German stuff – I speak German. I want more non-German content there! π
Ghost (ghost.org) might be a good alternative to Substack and de-duplicate the work of posting to Mastodon as ActivityPub/Mastodon accounts can follow your Ghost blog natively.
Since you want to reach people on Bluesky the latest version apparently lets people follow from there too. But I’ve only used the previous version so can’t comment on how good it is.
The biggest downside I can imagine is the time involved in the initial set-up and then learning how it differs from WordPress.
And if you’re not self-hosting it looks a little pricey to me (on ghost.org).
PS – I found this post via RSS (long-time reader, super-rare commenter!)
A thumbs-up from me for Ghost as a publishing tool. It just works and, as a UX friend of mine says, “is how WordPress should work.” Newsletter and ActivityPub integrations seem to work well and it’ll take care of subscriptions and billing for you.
Migrating content was relatively painless. I seem to have started turning up in Google searches now, which wasn’t the case with WordPress.
I pay Ghost $11 a month for hosting (just one blog), but it seems prices have gone up since I signed up. There are other Ghost hosters out there. I use tinylitics for stats.
I have the opposite experience with LinkedIn over the last months: I started writing about United Nations reform and the UN financial crisis in the way I used to blog when I was a Euroblogger. Daily, multiple times. I have gotten more interaction, more positive responses, more feedback and more meaningful comments than I ever had on my blog. My LinkedIn commentary reaches people across the entire UN system, from headquarters Geneva and New York to missions and staff in Chad or Thailand. I’ve gone from 800 to 4500 followers in <4 months.
I haven't figured out the LinkedIn algorithm exactly, but by just blogging like I used to blog β quick and dirty β the dynamics are similar to the good old days. And on this topic (United Nations), hardly ever somebody cared on Twitter or any other platform.
One of the feedbacks I have received from new followers is that I provide information and analysis no one else provides, and they want that information and analysis. I don't know if this is objectively true, but subjectively this is what seems to ensure that what I write is reaching people it is meant to reach.
I think this is different depending on the sector. In the railway industry / politics of railways overlap, it is all positioning – people making statements of what they did, why they did it. And sharing and re-sharing of pieces that suit their ideology, even if there is no factual basis to what they are sharing. And there is scant little learning. And worst of all the numbers of people telling me what I already know is infuriating. Yeah, it’s not like I really know anything about international railways *as I run a massive project about that*, but then I stop and realise that most of the people commenting have no idea whatsoever that I do run a project about that.