2/ Little good evidence Big5 has much impact for political comms. If writing about ‘fake news’ then proper science/evidence shd be important
1/ big @Guardian by @carolecadwalla on Mercer/Cambridge Analytica = full of errors & itself spreads disinformationhttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage …
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
3/ CA had ~0% role in Brexit referendum. Hacks who take Banks/Wigmore babble re data seriously are in the wrong job
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
4/ Qstn: How likely is it a 'brilliant secretive billionaire quant fund guy' wd engage in criminal conspiracy w Andy Wigmore?!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
5/ Look at Leave.EU official return to Electoral Cmsn. CA absent. Would Mercer/CA leave selves open to criminal charges for Wigmore?! No
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
6/ Wigmore’s babble re Facebook ‘Likes’ = wrong. Zuckerberg changed FB advertising ~2013 to make paid ads in Newsfeed the important thing
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
7/ This babble fooled hacks & MPs during REF & it’s bad papers like Guardian still fall for it - do your homework, don’t get spun by clowns
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
8/ idea Pentagon is great at psyops = wrong. Evidence is DoD remains rubbish as it admits & all studies show, & cf McChrystal head of JSOC
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
9/ Guardian piece = let’s combine Trump/secret hedge fund/‘AI’/self-serving commercial PR/conspiracies re DoD psyops & create a narrative
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
10/ This is important cos there ARE serious issues re social media/data science & politics. But as I wrote re REF, MSM not equipped for this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
11/ Media bosses: if you want to cover this properly - build serious data science team who can tell you truth/junk and charlatans/experts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
12/ Your new DS team will also be able to improve your own marketing & save you money from data charlatans so u really shd do this
-
appreciate you're trying to link ur tweets but please, for the love of God, do it sequentially so they create single thread
-
v sorry i was trying for first time!
-
I thought you might be, it's certainly an improvement!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
12/ Dont want to take my word? Read MIT’s verdict. MIT understands the technology it is writing about & ‘evidence’https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603747/the-right-wing-propaganda-machine-may-not-be-as-smart-as-you-think/ …
-
to clarify that isn't MIT's view. It is a comment piece in MIT's independent tech magazine. Cc
@jason_pontin -
Yes, as we joke, "The views of
@techreview are not often those of MIT's faculty or Administration." -
cool
@odysseanproject perhaps correct that tweet of yours?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.